Anthony Rizzo & Judge Faces Criticism for Not Taking COVID 19 Vaccine

The COVID-19 pandemic has had a profound impact on the world, affecting all aspects of life, including professional sports. In the realm of Major League Baseball (MLB), the vaccination status of players has become a topic of public scrutiny. Two notable players who have faced criticism for their decision not to take the COVID-19 vaccine are Anthony Rizzo and Aaron Judge. This article delves into the reasons behind their choices, examines the criticisms they have received, and explores the broader implications of vaccination decisions in professional sports.

Chapter 1: The Importance of Vaccination in Sports

1.1 Public Health and Safety Vaccination plays a critical role in protecting individuals and communities from the spread of infectious diseases. In the context of professional sports, where close physical contact and team dynamics are integral, vaccination is seen as a crucial measure to minimize the risk of transmission and maintain the health and safety of players, staff, and fans.

1.2 Role Modeling and Influence Professional athletes, including baseball players, have a significant platform and influence over their fanbase. Their vaccination choices can impact public perception and shape attitudes towards vaccines. Many argue that athletes have a responsibility to lead by example and promote public health measures, including vaccination, in order to protect themselves and the wider community.

Chapter 2: Anthony Rizzo’s Decision

2.1 Personal Reasons and Concerns Anthony Rizzo, a highly respected player and cancer survivor, has chosen not to receive the COVID-19 vaccine. Rizzo has cited personal reasons and concerns about the vaccine’s potential long-term effects as factors influencing his decision. His experience battling cancer may have influenced his perspective on health decisions and risk assessment.

2.2 Criticisms and Backlash Rizzo’s decision has drawn criticism from various quarters, including fans, media, and public health advocates. Critics argue that as a prominent figure in the baseball community, Rizzo’s choice not to get vaccinated sends a conflicting message and undermines efforts to promote vaccination and public health.

Chapter 3: Aaron Judge’s Decision

3.1 Privacy and Personal Choice Aaron Judge, another prominent player for the New York Yankees, has chosen not to disclose his vaccination status. Judge has cited privacy concerns and emphasized that vaccination decisions should be personal choices. He has also expressed a desire to keep his medical information private.

3.2 Public Debate and Speculation Judge’s decision not to disclose his vaccination status has sparked public debate and speculation. Some argue that as a public figure, he should be transparent about his vaccination status, while others assert that privacy should be respected, and individuals have the right to make personal health decisions without scrutiny.

Chapter 4: The Impact on Team Dynamics and Public Perception

4.1 Team Environment and Unity The vaccination decisions of Rizzo and Judge have the potential to affect team dynamics within the New York Yankees organization. Differing vaccination choices among teammates can create divisions or affect trust and camaraderie. It is essential for teams to manage such situations effectively and maintain unity within the locker room.

4.2 Perception and Fan Reactions Vaccination decisions by high-profile players like Rizzo and Judge can shape public perception and fan reactions. Some fans may admire their individual choices, seeing them as exercises of personal freedom, while others may be critical, viewing their decisions as a failure to prioritize public health or set a positive example for others.

Chapter 5: Balancing Personal Freedom and Public Responsibility

5.1 Individual Rights and Autonomy The debate surrounding vaccination in professional sports raises broader questions about personal freedoms and individual rights. Athletes, like any individuals, have the right to make decisions about their health and bodies. This includes the decision to be vaccinated or not, based on personal beliefs, concerns, or medical considerations.

5.2 Public Responsibility and Community Impact While individuals have the right to make personal health choices, professional athletes also have a public responsibility as role models and influencers. Critics argue that their choices can have consequences beyond their personal sphere, potentially affecting public health and community well-being.


The decisions of Anthony Rizzo and Aaron Judge not to receive the COVID-19 vaccine have generated significant attention and criticism. As public figures, their choices are subject to scrutiny and have implications beyond their personal lives. While individuals have the right to make decisions about their health, it is important to consider the broader impact on public health and the responsibilities that come with being influential figures in professional sports. The debate surrounding vaccination in sports serves as a reminder of the delicate balance between personal freedoms and public responsibilities in times of crisis.

Leave a Comment